![]() they are frustratingly coy about some of the dossier’s more controversial claims. whether or not one approves of Fusion as an enterprise, Simpson and Fritsch’s efforts to justify some of their less-savory work begin to drag the story down. is most interesting as an addition to the burgeoning genre of journalism about journalism - media that, in a truth-starved time, seeks to explain not only the reporter’s conclusions but also how the reporter arrived at them. ![]() Are you still holding out hope for the release of a lewd video of Donald Trump in a Moscow hotel room, so tantalizingly described in the dossier? Crime in Progress won’t sate your desire for the 'pee tape,' but it also won’t disprove the tape’s existence if you want to believe in it. Is your position that the infamous document is a sham product cobbled together by Democratic operatives out to smear the president? Crime in Progress is unlikely to convince you otherwise. What you think of the new book by Fusion GPS founders Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch - better known as the men behind the Steele dossier - will depend almost entirely on what view you take of the dossier itself. But the truth about Trumpworld is that no form of journalism is quite fast enough to keep up with every new development, because there is always another potential 'crime in progress.' Read Full Review > ![]() By getting their version of events out to the public, in advance of that of the Justice Department, the authors have performed a neat bit of publishing jujitsu. But they criticize Mueller’s probe for failing to heed the main lesson of Watergate: to 'follow the money'. The authors praise Mueller for documenting more than a hundred and forty suspicious contacts between Trump’s campaign and Russians, and for criminally indicting thirty-four individuals, including six in Trump’s inner circle and a dozen Russian agents behind the hack of the Democrats’ e-mails and thirteen individuals and three companies tied to Russia’s Internet Research Agency. Some readers of Crime in Progress may begin to wonder if the special counsel Robert Mueller didn’t miss the mark. it becomes evident that in the past few years have thrown nearly as much chum to the media as the keepers have to the seals at the National Zoo, up the street from their Dupont Circle offices. Critics will likely take issue with some of the authors’ others claims, including their contention that others bear the brunt of the responsibility for the confidential dossier leaking, not them. Whether Simpson and Fritsch’s score-settling, tell-all account will change any minds remains to be seen, but they present a mountain of evidence that Trump’s dealings with corrupt foreign players-particularly those from the former Soviet Union-are both real and go back decades.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |